Friday, June 13, 2008

The Diehard Unicorn Nullification Conservative Enterprise Society is in Session

THE DIEHARD UNICORN NULLIFICATION CONSERVATIVE ENTERPRISE SOCIETY IS IN SESSION

Welcome to the current meeting of the Diehard Unicorn Nullification Conservative Enterprise Society. We were founded when we realized the public; particularly the security weak liberal members of same were totally unprepared for an invasion of wild horses into their community, let alone ones with horns. The scientific fact obsessed left wingers among us may point out that there are no recent sightings of unicorns, which just underscores their lack of readiness . . . Thus this principle of expecting the unexpected, not to mention the unprecedented and the unproven, came to be used as arguments of immense leverage. At each session, we’ll highlight such an example. Today’s emphasis will be on the dangers to our food supply (yes, our food supply) posed by the “death tax”, which is the crux of the all rights to the rich arguments against having any inheritance tax, at all. That said a married couple for all intents and purposes doesn’t pay a penny until after they can each leave $2,000,000 tax-free, but the “killer” argument by those against any tax at all, is that small farmers in the past have gone under trying to pay off the government. Truth be told, this danger to us is every bit as real and rational as that of unicorns because according to the government’s own records, (kept on such matters since the Depression), not one single farmer has ever gone bankrupt paying inheritance taxes. However, what if such disasters do happen and as in the case of a unicorn invasion, we’re soft on security and we’re not ready. Thus the logic expressed, and so well begun (we think) by the Diehard Unicorn Nullification Conservative Enterprise Society must continue.

Now believe it or not, we have rivals in this logic genre, the Duplicitous Unprecedented Historians, who will also be heard from in this forum.

No comments:

The Faux News Network Principles


A) We distort, you abide
B) Or we retort if you deride, unless we choose not to
C) Complete sentences are acceptable in lieu of complete truths
D) It’s OK to criticize the 2006 Democratic Congress for all America’s problems since 2001
E) We shoot from the flip
F) We’re not always accurate but we’re always certain
G) On what we feel is wrong in this world, we can’t stop people from saying I don’t agree or I don’t care, but we won’t let them say I didn’t know
H) The director’s board has a whim of irony
I) In times of emergency, we should rally around our President: In times of democracy he should do the same for us
J) We proudly plagiarize in advance, examples available upon request
K) It’s easy to be fun-based when you’re fact based
L) Good news parody makes for good news parity
M) And, of course, our goal is and always will be to be the most trusted name in Faux News