| Jesus's favorite Super PAC? |
Monday, October 29, 2012
Friday, October 12, 2012
|
Friday, October 5, 2012
|
the Yankees comfortably in front, which they were. He said turn on MSNBC and then FOX and you
would see two different universes. I would add to then turn on Brian Williams to find out what really
happened. On Brian Williams we had the best set of fact checkers. Particularly Andrea Mitchell, who
went forward with her “truth squad” and maybe the biggest single debate was the President’s claim and Mitt Romney’s strong denial that he did not promise a $5 trillion tax cut.
He would make the Bush tax cuts permanent.
He would cut all rates an additional 20%.
He would repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax.
And permanently repeal the Estate Tax.
The tax policy department currently headed by two former Bush addvisors said it would cost $4.8 trillion over 10 years. Not $5 trillion, but pretty darn close. And obviously all the deductions in the world, and Romney still won’t say what they are, won’t cover $4 trillion dollars. Unfortunately, Mr. Romney's level of truth came nowhere near his level of rhetoric.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
| AIR MITT |
Air Mitt or should we say err Mitt (as in e-r-r) has surfaced
in one of the more interesting press conferences held by Willard Mitt Romney.
In fact, this past Saturday he was talking
about the electrical fire on the plane which Mrs. Romney was flying and thank
heaven everyone was okay, and he went on to say the problem with such a thing
is that you have no place to go on a plane.
Well we knew that at Real Fox News.
But then he went on to say that “because you can’t open the windows for
ouside oxygen and why haven’t they figured out how to do that. And our answer would be because an open
window or windows at 400-500 miles per hour would have some other logistical
difficulties. Okay, we did say that Republican compassion is to compassion as Republican
science is to science. But really Mitt,
power windows on a flying jet aircraft?
Seriously?
|
It’s good that Linda McMahon is running for senate. It’s good for the people who were out almost
a million dollars from the banks in 1975.
Of course, I’d be curious to know just what that computes in today’s
dollars, in lost opportunity, etc. But
it’s good for them because she’s planning on paying it back. It’s good for all the printers who get her
business. Many printers have benefited over the years from her
in New Hampshire. More recently it
appears some in CT because they would not if she wasn’t running for
senate. And it’s good for the state of
CT because she is now caught up in our taxes in the “luxury mansion.” Good for her.
And to repeat, it is honestly
good she is running for senate. But of
course if she were all that honest she wouldn’t have had to run for senate to
pay back all those debts of those people who trusted her that she burnt; to pay
the taxes she had due. And maybe she’ll
even get around retroactively to giving her former employees health care and
benefits they never had. In fact if we
could keep Linda McMahon running for office and losing, we think she could do a
lot of good.
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Friday, September 14, 2012
Friday, September 7, 2012
|
We must apologize again for plagiarizing in advance, as we
did yesterday to the great Stephen Colbert. In the USA Today published September
6, I had the following submission;
Clobert closed last night saying “Mitt, you just
keep demanding that Americans answer the question are you better off than you
were 4 years ago. But just don’t answer it yourself, because that would mean
releasiung more than 2 years of ur tax returns.
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
|
“Are you
better off than you were 4 years ago” is a question that Mitt Romney has every
right to ask, and the Democrats are going to have to answer. That said, my problem
with Mr. Romney is not his query but his
approach, as he constantly uses the word
“you” in describing economic challenges, and he never, but never uses the word “we”.
And I can’t help but wonder if that is because he personally is much better off than he was 4 years ago. But the
American people can’t get that answer because unlike every presidential
candidate in recent memory, including his own father, McCain, Obama, Kerry,
Bush, Clinton et al, he has not released a representative number of his own tax
returns. It’s as if someone had regularly shouted down Vietnam War protesters
and then avoided the draft himself. Oh wait, Mitt Romney did that too. Really
Mr. Romney, your lack of candor is taxing our patience, because regarding
Republican presidential candidates we are certainly not more informed than we
were 4 years ago.
Friday, August 31, 2012
|
number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech. That was by Sally
Kohn and she works for an organization called Fox news. OMG when someone on the right lies too
much for Fox we at real Faux News need to point it out. And we have a new knick-name, it’s Lyin’ Ryan.
|
exploits are legendary, and who certainly got the interest of her on screen male partners and viewers.
Wasn’t it fair to contradict Obama when you see the reaction of these men, and say to Mr. Obama, “You didn’t build that?”
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
|
Who could forget candidate George W. Bush’s phrase that he was a “compassionate conservative”, directly implying that an entire political philosophy need such a qualifier. Well, given past and current Republican attitudes towards the poor, ill, disadvantaged and women who could say that Mr. Bush was not prescient? Now Congressman Todd Akin comes along as the latest case in point, running as a Republican for Senate in Missouri and said “if it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down”.
An amazing attitude to be sure, but what’s more amazing is his current role in this conservative Republican House of Representatives, namely that he serves on their science committee. Which leads any thinking person to the inescapable conclusion that conservative compassion is to compassion as conservative science is to science.
Thursday, August 9, 2012
|
John Stewart made that very point when commenting on the
LIBOR scandal by noting that the two lead protagonists were named Rich and
Diamond, when Stewart said, “Are you kidding?”
Well, we at Real Faux News have another entry for
the "What’s
In A Name" sweepstakes from the breaking news on the banking scandal at
SCB. It seems that they are accused of
having made illegal trades involving the government of Iran and
pocketing
commissions of hundreds of millions of dollars in the bargain. So why
do “What’s In a Name?” Because a New York bank regulator who has
taken it upon himself to initiate the investigation is named Ben
Lawsky. So the greedy guys at LIBOR are named Diamond
and Rich and the banking enforcer is named Lawsky!
So stay tuned because we’re waiting to find out if the guy
behind the Republican Super Pacs is named Hiddenbucksman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Faux News Network Principles |
| B) Or we retort if you deride, unless we choose not to |
| C) Complete sentences are acceptable in lieu of complete truths |
| D) It’s OK to criticize the 2006 Democratic Congress for all America’s problems since 2001 |
| E) We shoot from the flip |
| F) We’re not always accurate but we’re always certain |
| G) On what we feel is wrong in this world, we can’t stop people from saying I don’t agree or I don’t care, but we won’t let them say I didn’t know |
| H) The director’s board has a whim of irony |
| I) In times of emergency, we should rally around our President: In times of democracy he should do the same for us |
| J) We proudly plagiarize in advance, examples available upon request |
| K) It’s easy to be fun-based when you’re fact based |
| L) Good news parody makes for good news parity |
| M) And, of course, our goal is and always will be to be the most trusted name in Faux News |
