FAUX NEWS NETWORK

WOULD THE REVERSE BE ADVERSE?

This marks the beginning of a new feature. Also done as a stand-up act at Real Fox News in which we describe a rumor and or factoid about a person in the public's eye and say if it had been about some one on the opposite side of the argument would have been major, minor, or non existent issue. But would the reverse have been adverse? What if we were to tell you that George Zimmerman the shooter of Trayvon Martin had been involved with drugs and suspended from his daily rounds because of it? Important or no? What if we had told you that Trayvon Martin had been arrested for a violence in his household and a different time for an assault on a police officer. Important or no? We are guessing people might not think that marijuana with George Zimmerman was not all that big a deal but they did when it was actually Trayvon Martin and it actually wasn’t so. And we might think that people would make a big, big, big deal if Trayvon Martin had been arrested for assaulting a police officer and violence in his home, but actually that was never the case, what was the case with George Zimmerman who was arrested for domestic violence one time and assaulting a police officer another. You have to ask yourself in this “liberal media” as portrayed on Fox News, is it a big deal that those are facts about George Zimmerman’s background? And again how do you get involved in a self defense situation “standing your ground” if you are pursuing someone after the 911 people tell you not to? Reverse, adverse more to come.