Let’s look at what primaries Hillary Clinton has won: New Hampshire, Michigan, Nevada and Florida. On balance Barack Obama has prevailed in Iowa, and South Carolina. Next consider Fauxvians, where Mrs. Clinton is likely to win: New York, California, New Jersey and most of New England, while Mr. Obama looks good in the Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee and Arkansas primaries. Not entirely but for the most part, Hill is winning primaries where the Dems will, should, or could win in a national election, while Barack looks best where in recent elections, for the most part, the Democrats have done worse. Maybe it’s a Barack to the Future foreshadowing, that he did win, and we should note solidly, where his party couldn’t, or maybe these golden moments for Barack are Election Day fool’s gold as in indelibly red.
Monday, February 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Faux News Network Principles |
B) Or we retort if you deride, unless we choose not to |
C) Complete sentences are acceptable in lieu of complete truths |
D) It’s OK to criticize the 2006 Democratic Congress for all America’s problems since 2001 |
E) We shoot from the flip |
F) We’re not always accurate but we’re always certain |
G) On what we feel is wrong in this world, we can’t stop people from saying I don’t agree or I don’t care, but we won’t let them say I didn’t know |
H) The director’s board has a whim of irony |
I) In times of emergency, we should rally around our President: In times of democracy he should do the same for us |
J) We proudly plagiarize in advance, examples available upon request |
K) It’s easy to be fun-based when you’re fact based |
L) Good news parody makes for good news parity |
M) And, of course, our goal is and always will be to be the most trusted name in Faux News |
No comments:
Post a Comment